An alliance of cinema-goers, film writers and local artists have united to condemn the Competition Commission’s provisional decision to request Cineworld, the new owners of the Cambridge Arts Picturehouse, to sell or close one of its cinemas in the city.
Last year’s acquisition by Cineworld PLC of City Screen Ltd, the company behind the Picturehouse cinema chain, was recently referred to the Commission. Their provisional report found that ticket prices were at risk of rising as a direct result of the buyout in three locations across the UK: Aberdeen, Bury St Edmunds and Cambridge. Their reasoning was that cinemas tend to set prices in line with local competitors, and that audiences between the cinemas were shared to a significant degree.
A large group of Picturehouse supporters have come together to expose these findings as fundamentally flawed. The Commission’s report has unfairly ignored the following facts:
An online petition has been set up at Change.org to demonstrate the strength of support for the endangered Picturehouse cinemas, rapidly attracting over 500 signatures within 24 hours of being launched. Details of the campaign’s arguments against the decision can be found there.
Supporters are also urged to write directly to the Competition Commission with their concerns. The deadline for responses is Tuesday 10 September 2013.
High profile supporters of the campaign to keep the Arts Picturehouse open include Cambridge’s MP, Julian Huppert, and Cambridge City Council.
Toby Miller, host of the ‘Bums on Seats’ film review show on Cambridge 105, said:
“The Arts Picturehouse is the beating heart of film in Cambridge. It provides a completely different experience to the two major multiplexes in the city, by offering something to all those who want more than just another Hollywood blockbuster. The range and depth of screenings and events hosted there is second to none in the region, and its loss would be a devastating blow to Cambridge’s cultural landscape. The risks involved in losing the Arts Picturehouse far outweigh any possible benefits connected to ticket prices. We urge the Competition Commission to reconsider its decision or to seek an alternative to the forced sell-off.”
Also supporting the campaign is TAKE ONE, the official review magazine of the Cambridge Film Festival, and local blogger Mark Liversidge, whose detailed analysis of the financial arguments in the report can be found on his website The Movie Evangelist.
Notes for editors
1. Any interested party is invited to respond to the Competition Commission’s provisional findings, in writing, by no later than Tuesday 10 September 2013. To submit evidence, please email: [email protected] or write to:
Inquiry Manager
Cineworld/City Screen merger
Competition Commission
Victoria House
Southampton Row
LONDON
WC1B 4AD
2. Further information about the campaign to support the Picturehouses can be requested by contacting TAKE ONE at: [email protected]
3. MP Julian Huppert’s letter to the Competition Commission can be found on his website (http://julianhuppert.org.uk/)
Julian Huppert’s web-site says this :
It is feared that Cineworld could be forced to sell Cambridge’s Arts Picturehouse along with other cinemas to lessen competition [sic].
Either I’ve got it all wrong by thinking that it’s about increasing competition, or even an MP gets bamboozled by all this ‘competition’ stuff…
Julian Huppert MP, or his assistant, couldn’t have liked the comment – it has been deleted…
Interesting article in the Cambridge News that an art house cinema could be opening in the former Gala bingo hall in Hobson Street. Would be wonderful if it was Curzon and they could be persuaded to take over the Arts Picturehouse instead. Perhaps all is not lost yet!
I think that’s a misreading on the part of who wrote that article – the CC report looks at that and concludes it is unlikely cinema chain would open there, although some have thought about it in the past. It also examines the possibility of Curzon taking over, but for the reasons outlined in the petition, this (whilst better than *no* cinema) still ignores a whole host of issues. It wouldn’t be a loss of *all*, no – but it would still be a loss of a hell of a lot. I’d encourage you to have a read of Mark Liversidge’s (http://movieevangelist.wordpress.com/) analysis of that possibility. The programming would likely very noticeably change even under e.g. Curzon or Everyman. The voice really needs to be to keep APH (and Abbeygate & Belmont) open under PH management.
I have had a read of Mark’s report (anybody else wanting to read it, the link provided by Jim doesn’t work, but just scroll down and you’ll find it) and it certainly makes interesting reading.
I don’t post much on here as I don’t understand the ins and outs of the situation in Cambridge, I just saw the Cambridge News article and thought people might be interested to read it.
Jim – you say that the programming would likely very noticeably change – do you know why that is? When I lived in London, the Renoir cinema was my favourite and I would have thought that type of programming would be good for Cambridge.